Post by mistyssaktersfo33 on Jan 4, 2024 4:12:04 GMT -5
The way these situations are handled after the update at the international level has been greatly improved. Sharing the same address seems to list results from the same domain as duplicates. For example if a medical clinic has different clinic locations and various offices registered within the same address or within the same address then now the likelihood of Google showing only one result increases while other results are hidden even if they are related. This is a long-term visible behavior in organic results. Search engines will not show more results from the same website except in rare cases.
But if the user zooms in on the corresponding location, the results of the hidden filtering are visible. Experiments carried out by the agency show that when establishing duplication of certain locations not only is considered Email Marketing List so for two similar listings sharing the same address it is not enough to only mention the elements of difference floors apartments etc. This proves that Google’s algorithm is much more complex than we intuitively think and there must be a lot of company-related data on the company’s servers. It should be noted that this filtering is not an actual penalty.
Google simply chose not to show the result because it thought it was already showing and belonged to the same company. Practically like a website with two very related pages about bees Google will only show one of them in the results as well as the local listings area only in this case it will mistakenly identify that both listings belong to the same owner. Where users search is increasingly important. Experiments show local results are now more affected by visitor location following a Google update so people receive significantly different results for the same search depending on geographic proximity to them.
But if the user zooms in on the corresponding location, the results of the hidden filtering are visible. Experiments carried out by the agency show that when establishing duplication of certain locations not only is considered Email Marketing List so for two similar listings sharing the same address it is not enough to only mention the elements of difference floors apartments etc. This proves that Google’s algorithm is much more complex than we intuitively think and there must be a lot of company-related data on the company’s servers. It should be noted that this filtering is not an actual penalty.
Google simply chose not to show the result because it thought it was already showing and belonged to the same company. Practically like a website with two very related pages about bees Google will only show one of them in the results as well as the local listings area only in this case it will mistakenly identify that both listings belong to the same owner. Where users search is increasingly important. Experiments show local results are now more affected by visitor location following a Google update so people receive significantly different results for the same search depending on geographic proximity to them.